Justin Baldoni Files Response to Blake Liverly’s suggestion to dismiss his calculators

Justin Baldoni have left a response to Blake livelyProposal to dismiss his lawsuit of $ 400 million against her.

Baldoni sued lively for defamation and other claims on January 16, about a month after Lively handed in a mood who accused Baldoni of sexual harassment and orchestration of a revenge campaign over their Behind the scenes fall During filming It ends with us. The film, which was released in theaters on August 9, 2024, played Lively and Baldoni, who also directed. The actor’s trial is also called Lively’s spouse, Ryan Reynolds.

Livelly’s lawyers, Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, submitted the proposal to be dismissed on March 20which calls Baldoni’s claims “revenge and wandering” and an abuse of the legal system. Specifically, they said that the recently adopted California civilian code section 47.1 prohibits retaliation moods bound to public information on sexual harassment.

Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, responded to the proposal in the southern district in New York on Thursday, April 3 per court document obtained by humans.

Freedman says Lively requested to reject the trial for “Failure to indicate a claim.” She also asked for legal fees, costs, injuries and penalties.

Freedman, however, says Baldoni’s complaint gives details of “Lively’s calculated efforts first to blackmail and manipulate” Baldoni and his Wayfarer Studios Production Team, “to Ceding Total Control over the film It ends with us And then to slander and scapegoat when her plan backfired. ”

They add that Baldoni’s complaint gives specific claims about defamation against lively that are “sufficient to defeat dismissal.” Baldoni’s lawyer also claims that although a dismissal is granted, Lively is not guilty lawyer fees and injuries.

The answer claims Blake’s attempt to dismiss Baldoni’s trial is her way of asking the court “to discover that she is immune from some Obligation to her illegal acts. ”

Freedman, who deals with California Civil Code section 47.1, says that the executive that it would require the court to determine “that she acted alone and without evil and that she had a reasonable basis for her claims.”

“Miss Lively and her circle of Hollywood elites cannot prevent my clients from exercising their constitutional right to make the court to clear their names from her false and harmful claims,” ​​Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman says in a statement on Thursday.

He added Liverly’s proposal to reject: “What MS Lively tries to do is to put a dangerous precedent by excluding the judicial doors to my clients and punishing them to have their day in court, a proper protected by the first amendment.”

Never miss a story – register for People’s free daily newsletters Keeping up to date on the best of what people have to offer, from celebrity news to compelling stories of human interest.

“This right not only protects Mr. Baldoni and Wayfarer parties in this particular case, but all Americans in the future that have false accusations that are taken out against them and seek liberation from our legal system,” Freedman continues. “This must stop here, and we will continue to fight against this obvious attempt to block access to the court system and weaken our country’s constitution to serve those who are in the position of power.”

People were enough for Lively’s representatives for comments on Thursday.