Prince Harry sought police protection for murder threats from al-Qaeda

• Prince Harry asked for better police protection after being threatened by al-Qaeda, shows a new court document
• The Duke of Sussex, 40, is struggling for a restoration of the state -funded police protection that was removed from him when he and his wife, Meghan Markle, went back from their royal roles 2020 2020
• Prince Harry’s lawyers describe the appeal as a struggle for his life, and he tells people, “people would be shocked by what is held back”

Prince Harry Pursued police protection in the middle of a threat from al-Qaeda after his official state-funded security was abolished after his decision to go back from his royal role.

The claim was made in the closed session in the two -day hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice in London last week, As the Duke of Sussex participated infor an important legal appeal to restore its automatic police protection in the UK

A summary of the closed session, seen by People, was released on April 17, and the document said that Harry “confirmed that he had requested some protection after a threat was made against him by Al Qaeda.”

The Duke of Sussex’s lawyer Shaheed Fatima said that the terrorist organization called for Prince Harry “to be murdered” after his security was downgraded in 2020.

Prince Harry’s security problems are partly derived from his military service and the general attention it attracted. He earned two tours in Afghanistan with the British army, experiences he later wrote about in his memoir, Spare. In the book, he discussed his role in combat operations and the lasting impact of his service, which attracted attention from extremist groups.

The Duke of Sussex Legal Team has described the security case as a struggle for his life. Much of the argument heard on April 9, the second day of the procedure, focused on the fact that no formal risk assessment (RMB) was completed when Harry’s automatic security was removed in 2020 when he and his wife, Meghan Marklewent back from their royal roles.

Instead, the Government’s RaveC committee, responsible for decisions on taxpayers’ funded security, provided him a case based on the current needs.

“One must not forget the human dimension in this case. There is a person who sits behind me whose security, whose security and whose life is at stake,” Harry’s lawyer Fatima said in an emotional summary last Wednesday. “There is a person who sits behind me who has been told that he gets a special tailor -made process when he knows in his experience, it is a process that is obviously inferior in all respects.”

“His presence here and through this appeal is a potent demonstration of how much this appeal means to him and his family,” she said.

The Duke and Duke of Sussex raise their children, Prince Sarker5 and Princess LiliBet3, in California, and his lawyers have previously said he “don’t feel safe“To bring their family to the UK after the loss of taxpayers’ funded police protection.

The open summary of posts in the closed session seen by people emphasized that Prince Harry has still not received Make-or-Break RMB analysis and the security arrangement for him is now “insufficient, inappropriate and ineffective.”

Feel “exhausted and overwhelmed,” Prince Harry told People when he left the court on April 9 as that His “worst fear has been confirmed by the entire legal disclosure in this case – And it’s really sad. ”

Can’t you get enough people’s royal coverage? Sign up for our free Royal newsletter To get the latest updates about Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!

Shaken by some of the information that appeared, he says in this week’s exclusive people about people, “people would be shocked by what is held back.”

He has long claimed that as a ceremonial head of the government, his father, King Charleshas the power to help restore the protection he fights for (a principle that the palace denies), with the lack of act that aggravates the distance between them.

A decision is expected in the coming weeks, and a source near Harry’s legal team said they were “cautiously optimistic” about the result.

The times reported that the losing side will be hit with a bill of about $ 1.9 million.