Jay-Z’s rap’s prosecutor files suggestion to dismiss his defamation against her

The woman who accused Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter Sexually attacking her in 2000 is now asking a judge to reject the rapper’s trial against her.

The woman, identified in court documents obtained by people like Jane Doe, alleged In a complaint from December 2024 as Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs Raped her at an MTV Video Music Awards After Party when she was 13 years old.

Although DOE’s lawyers voluntarily dismissed In February, Jay-Z submitted his own trial against DOE and her legal team, Tony Buzbee and David Fortney, a month later. He sued DOE and her lawyers and claimed malicious prosecution, abuse of process and civil conspiracy. He also sued DOE separately and claimed slander. In his complaint, he claimed that the first accusations of rape against him were deliberately “false” and “harmful” and does mood “strategically and tactically was calculated” in an attempt to blackmail him.

On Tuesday, April 22, DOE submitted a proposal to reject Jay-Z’s trial and claims that he “fails to state a claim on which exemption can be granted.”

Her lawyers claimed in the proposal that Jay-Z’s harmful prosecution on prosecution fails briefly because he claims “(…) the mood was initiated and charged for harmful reasons, not that any process was incorrectly used after the issuance.”

“Carter has not claimed facts that would support an abuse of process claims,” ​​says the proposal.

The notification states that the civil conspiracy requirement against the charger should also be rejected as her lawyers “has shown that those as lawyers are not responsible for civil conspiracy under these accusations.”

“Since a conspiracy requires more than one party, DOE cannot be responsible for civil conspiracy,” the movement continues.

DOE requests that the claim for defamation against her being dismissed and says that the charges in her complaints and comments to the media are “absolutely privileged” according to California’s law “and cannot form the basis for a claim.”

Doe’s proposal further claims that based on Jay-Z’s own accusations in his complaint, he was not damaged by any potential defamation statements, because he claimed that an NBC news work “disproved” DOE’s claims and because he claimed that “(n) o person of ordinary care and caution” would have thought. ”

In his submission, Jay-Z Does “free”-speech “him” was hit by actual and special injuries, including, but not limited to, damage to his personal and professional reputation, damage to his business unit, the ROC-nation-which resulted in his business that was affected by significant losses that exceed 20 million dollars and the loss of loss of loss of loss

Jay-Z is looking for adopted, actual and punitive damage.

People were enough for Jay-Z, Doe and Buzbee for comments.

Jay-Z’s lawyer Alex Spiro in the past addressed the rapper’s decision to sue Doe and her lawyers, tell Good morning America In March, “The truth must come out completely. This person cannot be allowed to hide for reality that this was a false accusation.”

Never miss a story – register for People’s free daily newsletters Keeping up to date on the best of what people have to offer, from celebrity news to compelling stories of human interest.

Spiro also dealt with a recording that is said to be Doe that denied that Jay-Z ever sexually attacked her, and that buzbee “pressed” her to name Jay-Z.

“She says in no uncertain terms, Mr. Carter did not do this,” Spiro said last month. “It is effective a lie and the only reason why Mr. Carter is even involved in this was because she was pressed to involve him, pressed to include him by a lawyer.”

Buzbee replied and told GMA That Spiro’s claims were an “obvious lie.”