How Kendrick Lamar’s necklace at 2025 Super Bowl nods on Drake Feud

Kendrick Lamar made a big statement with one of his accessories on 2025 Super Bowl.

On Sunday, February 9, the heading Rapparen, 37, Half -time show At Caesar’s Superdome in New Orleans, where Kansas City Chiefs plays Philadelphia Eagles.

Lamar performed his hit “Not like US”, as recently Won this year’s record at 2025 Grammy Awards. The song works as one harebrained directed at the colleague Drake Where he calls the Canadian musician a pedophile and a “colonizer”. While Lamar changed a particularly sparkling lyric (he omitted the last word from the line “Certified Lover Boy? Certified Pedophiles”, which is referring to Drakes 2021 album Certified lover boy), he made sure to send a message with his ensemble.

Except flare jeans and a bold jacket It read “Gloria” across the front in capital letters, Lamar sported a diamond Rahaminov brooch worth $ 68,000 on his hat and a massive “a” chain, including jewels. The “A” necklace apparently nods to another lyric from “not like us”: “Tryna strikes a chord and it is probably a minor.”

In response to “Not Like Us”, which was released in May 2024, Drake archived a lawyer Against Universal Music Group, his own record label since 1009, to release and market the track.

People Puzzler Crossword is here! How fast can you solve it? Play now!

According to court documents obtained by People, Drake, 38 (whose real name is Aubrey Drake Graham), alleged on January 15, which submitted that the Universal Music Group “approved, published and launched a campaign to create a viral hit of a rap track track who wrongly accuses Drake of being a pedophile and requires violent retaliation against him. ”

According to the complaint, the Universal Music Group is claimed “repeatedly slandered dragon while” exploiting “and” make money “on his work” by releasing “not like us.”

The mood claims that “not like us” was intended to convey the specific, unthinkable and false actual accusation that Drake is a criminal pedophile and to suggest that the public should take Vigilante justice in response. ”

Never miss a story – register for People’s free daily newsletters Keeping up to date on the best of what people have to offer, from celebrity news to compelling stories of human interest.

“Not only are these claims false, but the notion that we would try to hurt any artist’s reputation – than lonely dragon – is illogical. We have invested massively in his music and our employees around the world have been working tirelessly for many years to help him achieve historical commercial and personal financial success, “told UMG to People in a statement.

They continued: “We have not and not engaged in defamation – against any individual. At the same time, we will vigorously defend this legal dispute to protect our people and our reputation, as well as all artists who can directly or indirect done something other than writing a song. ”